reading:topology

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
reading:topology [2023-05-30 00:37] asdfreading:topology [2023-06-12 04:42] (current) – [Set Theory and Logic] corrected a typo asdf
Line 3: Line 3:
 ===== Notes ===== ===== Notes =====
 ==== Set Theory and Logic ==== ==== Set Theory and Logic ====
-This chapter is a review of basic mathematical concepts, beginning with set theory. One key point to keep in mind is that Munkres will occasionally disambiguate the notation $(a,b)$ as an ordered pair versus as an interval by using $a\times b$ for the latter. The text also prefers $\subset$ over $\subseteq$, emphasizing proper subsets with $\subsetneq$. I will not follow that convention in these notes. +This chapter is a review of basic mathematical concepts, beginning with set theory. One key point to keep in mind is that Munkres will occasionally disambiguate the notation $(a,b)$ as an ordered pair versus as an interval by using $a\times b$ for the former. The text also prefers $\subset$ over $\subseteq$, emphasizing proper subsets with $\subsetneq$. I will not follow that convention in these notes. 
  
 Given a function $f:A\to B$, the text defines: Given a function $f:A\to B$, the text defines:
Line 38: Line 38:
  
 <WRAP center round box 80%> <WRAP center round box 80%>
-**Definition**+**Definition**: order type
  
 Suppose that $A$ and $B$ are two sets with respective order relations $<_A$ and $<_B$. We say that $A$ and $B$ have the same //order type// if there exists a bijection $f:A\to B$ s.t. $a_1<_A a_2 \implies f(a_1)<_B f(a_2)$. Suppose that $A$ and $B$ are two sets with respective order relations $<_A$ and $<_B$. We say that $A$ and $B$ have the same //order type// if there exists a bijection $f:A\to B$ s.t. $a_1<_A a_2 \implies f(a_1)<_B f(a_2)$.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 +
 +<WRAP center round box 80%>
 +**Definition**: largest element, smallest element
 +
 +Suppose that $A$ is a set ordered by the relation $<$. Let $A_0\subseteq A$. We say that $b$ is the //largest element// of $A_0$ if $b\in A_0$ and $x\leq b~\forall x\in A_0$. Similarly, we say that $a$ is the //smallest element// of $A_0$ if $a\in A_0$ and $a\leq x~\forall x\in A_0$. 
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +<WRAP center round box 80%>
 +**Definition**: bounded above, upper bound, supremum, bounded below, lower bound, infimum
 +
 +We say that the subset $A_0$ is //bounded above// if there is an element $b\in A$ s.t. $x\leq b~\forall x\in A_0$; $b$ is called an //upper bound// for $A_0$. If the set of all upper bounds for $A_0$ has a smallest element, that element is called the //supremum//, denoted $\sup A_0$. 
 +
 +Similarly, $A_0$ is //bounded below// if there is an element $a\in A$ s.t. $a\leq x~\forall x\in A_0$; $a$ is a //lower bound// for $A_0$. If the set of all lower bounds of $A_0$ has a largest element, that element is called the //infimum//, denoted $\inf A_0$. 
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +An ordered set $A$ has the //least upper bound property// if each nonempty subset $A_0$ of $A$ that is bounded above has a least upper bound. Analogously, it has the //greatest lower bound property// if each nonempty $A_0\subseteq A$ which is bounded below has a greatest lower bound. $A$ has one of these properties iff it has the other (see Exercise 3.13). 
 +
 +++++ Exercise 3.13 |
 +> Suppose that an ordered set $A$ has the least upper bound property. Prove that it has the greatest lower bound property.
 +
 +++++
 +
 +
  
 {{tag>math topology algebra}} {{tag>math topology algebra}}
  • reading/topology.1685407030.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2023-05-30 00:37
  • by asdf