Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
reading:topology [2023-05-30 00:37] – asdf | reading:topology [2023-06-12 04:42] (current) – [Set Theory and Logic] corrected a typo asdf | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===== Notes ===== | ===== Notes ===== | ||
==== Set Theory and Logic ==== | ==== Set Theory and Logic ==== | ||
- | This chapter is a review of basic mathematical concepts, beginning with set theory. One key point to keep in mind is that Munkres will occasionally disambiguate the notation $(a,b)$ as an ordered pair versus as an interval by using $a\times b$ for the latter. The text also prefers $\subset$ over $\subseteq$, | + | This chapter is a review of basic mathematical concepts, beginning with set theory. One key point to keep in mind is that Munkres will occasionally disambiguate the notation $(a,b)$ as an ordered pair versus as an interval by using $a\times b$ for the former. The text also prefers $\subset$ over $\subseteq$, |
Given a function $f:A\to B$, the text defines: | Given a function $f:A\to B$, the text defines: | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
<WRAP center round box 80%> | <WRAP center round box 80%> | ||
- | **Definition** | + | **Definition**: order type |
Suppose that $A$ and $B$ are two sets with respective order relations $<_A$ and $<_B$. We say that $A$ and $B$ have the same //order type// if there exists a bijection $f:A\to B$ s.t. $a_1<_A a_2 \implies f(a_1)< | Suppose that $A$ and $B$ are two sets with respective order relations $<_A$ and $<_B$. We say that $A$ and $B$ have the same //order type// if there exists a bijection $f:A\to B$ s.t. $a_1<_A a_2 \implies f(a_1)< | ||
</ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP center round box 80%> | ||
+ | **Definition**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Suppose that $A$ is a set ordered by the relation $<$. Let $A_0\subseteq A$. We say that $b$ is the //largest element// of $A_0$ if $b\in A_0$ and $x\leq b~\forall x\in A_0$. Similarly, we say that $a$ is the //smallest element// of $A_0$ if $a\in A_0$ and $a\leq x~\forall x\in A_0$. | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP center round box 80%> | ||
+ | **Definition**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | We say that the subset $A_0$ is //bounded above// if there is an element $b\in A$ s.t. $x\leq b~\forall x\in A_0$; $b$ is called an //upper bound// for $A_0$. If the set of all upper bounds for $A_0$ has a smallest element, that element is called the // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Similarly, $A_0$ is //bounded below// if there is an element $a\in A$ s.t. $a\leq x~\forall x\in A_0$; $a$ is a //lower bound// for $A_0$. If the set of all lower bounds of $A_0$ has a largest element, that element is called the // | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | An ordered set $A$ has the //least upper bound property// if each nonempty subset $A_0$ of $A$ that is bounded above has a least upper bound. Analogously, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ++++ Exercise 3.13 | | ||
+ | > Suppose that an ordered set $A$ has the least upper bound property. Prove that it has the greatest lower bound property. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ++++ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
{{tag> | {{tag> |