This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| |
writing:commonsense [2023-02-27 19:57] – created asdf | writing:commonsense [2023-02-27 20:16] (current) – asdf |
---|
====== [DRAFT] Common Sense as a Rhetorical Device ====== | ====== [DRAFT] Common Sense as a Rhetorical Device ====== |
> When used as a rhetorical device, "common sense" serves as a tautological justification. Importantly, I reject the of-deployed counter-arguments, "common sense isn't common," or, "everyone who isn't me lacks it." Rather, I argue that appealing to common sense is inherently a tactic wholly devoid of substance, much like appeals to so-called "biotruths". Invoking common sense is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche. | > When used as a rhetorical device, "common sense" serves as a tautological justification. Importantly, I reject the oft-deployed counter-arguments, "common sense isn't common," or, "everyone who isn't me lacks it." Rather, I argue that appealing to common sense is inherently a tactic wholly devoid of substance, much like appeals to so-called "biotruths". Invoking common sense is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche. |
| |
| I loathe "common sense" as a justification for anything. Typically, the response I receive to that statement is, "good point, common sense isn't common." I have almost as much distaste for that particular attitude---it's condescending, it's unproductive, and it completely misses my point. It's not that I believe common sense is some mythical lost element, but rather that it is deployed as a tautological explanation, something that need not be explained further. |