writing:commonsense

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

writing:commonsense [2023-02-27 19:57] – created asdfwriting:commonsense [2023-02-27 20:16] (current) asdf
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== [DRAFT] Common Sense as a Rhetorical Device ====== ====== [DRAFT] Common Sense as a Rhetorical Device ======
-> When used as a rhetorical device, "common sense" serves as a tautological justification. Importantly, I reject the of-deployed counter-arguments,  "common sense isn't common," or, "everyone who isn't me lacks it." Rather, I argue that appealing to common sense is inherently a tactic wholly devoid of substance, much like appeals to so-called "biotruths". Invoking common sense is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche. +> When used as a rhetorical device, "common sense" serves as a tautological justification. Importantly, I reject the oft-deployed counter-arguments,  "common sense isn't common," or, "everyone who isn't me lacks it." Rather, I argue that appealing to common sense is inherently a tactic wholly devoid of substance, much like appeals to so-called "biotruths". Invoking common sense is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche.  
 + 
 +I loathe "common sense" as a justification for anything. Typically, the response I receive to that statement is, "good point, common sense isn't common." I have almost as much distaste for that particular attitude---it's condescending, it's unproductive, and it completely misses my point. It's not that I believe common sense is some mythical lost element, but rather that it is deployed as a tautological explanation, something that need not be explained further
  • writing/commonsense.1677527825.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2023-02-27 19:57
  • by asdf